Law Firm & Business Legal Advisory Based in Chaiyaphum, Serving Clients Across ThailandContact 065-168-9499
PS⚖PS LAW AND BUSINESSLAWYERS & LEGAL ADVISORS
pslawandbusiness.com / Home / Practice Areas / Criminal Defense & Private Prosecution

Facing Criminal Charges or Considering Private Prosecution in Thailand?

Whether you are accused of a criminal offense or considering bringing a private criminal prosecution, the right starting point is to examine your legal standing, evidence and procedural options.

A single alleged offense may be pursued through more than one lawful route. An injured person whose complaint has stalled may, in certain cases, consider filing directly with the court under the Criminal Procedure Code, while the accused in the same matter has rights of defense. This page separates the issues by your position: the injured person considering prosecution, and the accused preparing a defense.

The Injured Person: Private Criminal Prosecution

Paid a deposit, received nothing, and police say it is civil — can I prosecute criminally myself?View analysis ↓

Illustrative situation: For example, you transferred a deposit under a sale contract; at the deadline the other party neither delivered nor responded, and the police told you it is "a civil matter" because a contract exists.

PROBLEM 1

Paid a deposit and got nothing — is this fraud?

RESPONSE 1

Review the representations made before the transaction, transfer records, and conduct after receiving the money, to determine whether deception existed at the time — the heart of fraud under Penal Code s. 341.

PROBLEM 2

The counterparty says they were merely late, not dishonest

RESPONSE 2

A contract does not automatically exclude criminal liability, but the question is whether this is pure breach or falsehood used to induce payment from the start — the pre-payment timeline and messages are key evidence.

PROBLEM 3

If police see a civil dispute, can the injured person file in court?

RESPONSE 3

Potentially, subject to conditions: the injured person must have first reported the offense as the law requires, and the public prosecutor must have ordered non-prosecution — then private prosecution may be possible under CPC s. 28, with the court often ordering a preliminary examination under s. 162.

Who this concerns

Buyers, deposit payers and businesses in transactions where the other side failed to perform and deception from the outset is suspected.

Common objection

If a contract was signed, can it really be fraud? — A signed contract does not close the door to criminal liability if false statements induced the agreement; but if the matter is genuinely a contractual debt, a criminal case may not stand and carries risks — assess the evidence first.

Evidence to preserve

  • Contracts, quotations and pre-transaction documents
  • Records of every transfer with dates
  • Conversations before and after payment, especially promises
  • A chronology of demands and avoidance

Relevant law

Penal Code s. 341 (fraud) · CPC ss. 28, 162 · Penal Code s. 96 (3-month complaint rule for private offenses)

Entrusted property not returned — embezzlement or just breach of contract?View analysis ↓

Illustrative situation: For example, you left a vehicle or machinery with an acquaintance for temporary use; repeated return dates passed, and the asset was later used or transferred onward without notice.

PROBLEM 1

Entrusted property not returned — where to start

RESPONSE 1

Examine the custody agreement, who last held the property, and when it was used or sold on. Embezzlement under Penal Code s. 352 requires proof of converting property received in good faith into one’s own.

PROBLEM 2

The other person claims ownership — how to respond

RESPONSE 2

Use title or possession documents, custody receipts, messages acknowledging the entrustment, and witnesses, to show the property was received for safekeeping, not transferred.

PROBLEM 3

Embezzlement versus breach — which route?

RESPONSE 3

Embezzlement concerns property received under a duty to manage or return; an unpaid money debt is purely civil. Correct classification determines criminal, civil, or parallel proceedings.

Who this concerns

Owners and lawful holders of vehicles, machinery, equipment and other property entrusted to others and not returned.

Common objection

If I lent money and it was not repaid, is that embezzlement? — As a rule, no. Non-repayment of a loan is a civil breach; embezzlement requires conversion of property received for custody or management. The elements differ and so do the routes.

Evidence to preserve

  • Title or possession documents
  • Custody receipts or messages acknowledging the entrustment
  • Records of demands and postponed returns
  • Evidence of use or onward sale

Relevant law

Penal Code s. 352 (embezzlement) · CPC ss. 28, 162

A neighbor fenced into my land but claims it is theirs — can I prosecute trespass?View analysis ↓

Illustrative situation: For example, returning to a vacant plot you find the fence moved inside your boundary, and the neighbor asserts their old line always covered that area.

PROBLEM 1

The fence was moved in — where to begin

RESPONSE 1

Verify boundary markers against the title deed and survey, historical photographs, and witnesses to the original line. Trespass under Penal Code s. 362 requires entering or depriving possession without right.

PROBLEM 2

The other side asserts their own claim

RESPONSE 2

With competing claims, the matter has both a civil boundary issue and a possible criminal possession issue — establish exactly how the entry occurred and what documents support each side.

PROBLEM 3

I want the land and the correct boundary back

RESPONSE 3

Restoring possession is a civil remedy; the criminal track addresses punishment for trespass. The two can proceed in parallel with different evidence.

Who this concerns

Landowners, lawful possessors, businesses and industrial premises facing encroachment.

Common objection

Does holding a title deed automatically win a trespass case? — No. The deed is strong evidence of title, but trespass must be proven as entry without right, and the other side may produce its own documents; the court weighs all the evidence.

Evidence to preserve

  • Title deed and survey plan
  • Photos of the old and current boundaries with timestamps
  • Written warning to the occupier
  • Witnesses to the original boundary or events

Relevant law

Penal Code s. 362 (trespass) · Civil: recovery of possession

Someone damaged my vehicle or machinery but says it was unintentional — I only have CCTVView analysis ↓

Illustrative situation: For example, your vehicle was damaged in a parking area; CCTV captured part of the event, but the other party calls it an accident without intent to destroy.

PROBLEM 1

Property damaged — what to preserve first

RESPONSE 1

Keep the original video file for the full period, photograph the damage, and value the loss. Criminal destruction under Penal Code s. 358 requires intentional damage or deprivation of benefit.

PROBLEM 2

The CCTV misses parts of the event — am I disadvantaged?

RESPONSE 2

Not necessarily. Video is one piece, weighed together with witnesses, photographs, and the other party’s own account; the court assesses overall credibility.

PROBLEM 3

I want repair costs — which claim?

RESPONSE 3

Compensation is a civil claim against the person causing the damage; the criminal destruction track is separate, and both may proceed with distinct goals.

Who this concerns

Owners of vehicles, homes, buildings, machinery and equipment that were damaged.

Common objection

Is CCTV alone enough? — Video carries weight but is rarely decisive alone; clarity, continuity, and corroborating evidence matter. There is no rule that screenshots always require lawyer certification, but verifiable originals are more credible.

Evidence to preserve

  • Original video files covering the incident
  • Damage photos and repair estimates
  • Usage history and pre-damage value
  • Witnesses present at or after the event

Relevant law

Penal Code s. 358 (criminal destruction) · Civil: damages claim

Falsely accused of theft — when the original case ends, can I sue back?View analysis ↓

Illustrative situation: For example, you were accused of taking another’s property when in fact its use was known to the owner; the case later ended without any punishment against you.

PROBLEM 1

Accused of something untrue — what to do

RESPONSE 1

Gather all evidence of the truth from the start — documents, messages, witnesses — and follow the original case closely, as its outcome affects your later options.

PROBLEM 2

The case ended without punishment — what does that mean

RESPONSE 2

Cases end without punishment for several reasons, such as insufficient evidence or missing elements; that is not the same as a finding that the complainant knowingly filed a false report.

PROBLEM 3

I want to sue back — what is required

RESPONSE 3

False reporting under Penal Code s. 137 requires proof the complainant knew the statement was false and intended to subject you to punishment — compare the report against the true evidence and the complainant’s conduct before deciding.

Who this concerns

Suspects, accused persons and acquitted defendants who believe an allegation was intentionally false.

Common objection

The original case ended — doesn’t that automatically prove a false report? — No. One case’s outcome does not decide another; the complainant’s intent must be proven separately. Rushing to sue without evidence of intent may forfeit your position.

Evidence to preserve

  • The complaint and statements in the original case
  • Documents and messages proving the truth
  • The judgment or order ending the original case
  • Evidence of the complainant’s conduct before and after reporting

Relevant law

Penal Code s. 137 (false report) · Related CPC procedures

The Accused: Investigation and Defense

Arrested in a narcotics case without knowing if the allegation is possession, sale, or joint conductView analysis ↓

Illustrative situation: For example, you were detained with items alleged to be narcotics, and your name appears in another person’s messages, while the actual charge remains unclear to you.

PROBLEM 1

Detained — what must I know first

RESPONSE 1

Ask what the allegation is and your rights to contact a lawyer or relative; examine the arrest and search records for legality; do not give substantive statements before understanding the charge.

PROBLEM 2

My name appears in others’ chats — am I disadvantaged?

RESPONSE 2

A name in messages is not automatic proof of guilt; the question is how your actual conduct connects to the alleged offense and role.

PROBLEM 3

The case reaches the prosecutor — what next

RESPONSE 3

Prepare a statement consistent with the evidence, gather proof of your actual activities, and review provisional-release rights under the law — without any guarantee of outcome.

Who this concerns

Suspects, accused persons and families in narcotics proceedings.

Common objection

Does being present or named in chats establish guilt? — No. The law examines each person’s acts and intent from evidence, not mere presence or a mentioned name.

Evidence to preserve

  • Arrest and search records, with details to verify
  • Records on testing of the alleged narcotics
  • Evidence of your actual conduct and activities
  • Originals of any messages or documents cited

Relevant law

Narcotics Act (classification by type and quantity) · Rights under the CPC during investigation

Charged with attempted murder after a fight, while intent is contestedView analysis ↓

Illustrative situation: For example, a drunken altercation left the other party seriously injured, and you face an attempted-murder allegation although you claim self-defense and no intent to kill.

PROBLEM 1

Facing a heavier charge than expected — start where

RESPONSE 1

Read the complaint or indictment to see how intent is alleged, and compare with the chronology, forensic findings, and actual witnesses — intent is the core of attempted murder.

PROBLEM 2

Witnesses conflict — what to do

RESPONSE 2

Build a timeline from neutral evidence — CCTV, medical records, wound locations — to test each account’s credibility.

PROBLEM 3

At trial — which line to prepare

RESPONSE 3

Prepare challenges to the alleged intent and contested facts with verifiable evidence, and assess the law of self-defense where applicable.

Who this concerns

Suspects, defendants and families in offenses against life and body.

Common objection

Is saying "I did not intend to kill" enough? — No. Intent is inferred from external circumstances — the weapon, number of wounds, sequence — so the challenge must rest on evidence, not bare assertion.

Evidence to preserve

  • Medical certificates and forensic results of both parties
  • CCTV or scene photographs
  • A chronology from neutral witnesses
  • Every statement record

Relevant law

Penal Code ss. 288–292 (murder/attempt) · s. 68 (self-defense) where conditions apply

Bank or crypto accounts under investigation for suspected money launderingView analysis ↓

Illustrative situation: For example, you received transfers from multiple customers, an account was provisionally frozen, and part of the funds is alleged to link to someone else’s unlawful activity.

PROBLEM 1

Accounts under review — first steps

RESPONSE 1

Assemble the origin of every transaction — contracts, receipts, business relationships — to show the inflows came from lawful activity.

PROBLEM 2

Multiple transfers and parties — what is my position

RESPONSE 2

Laundering liability concerns receiving, transferring, or assisting with property known to derive from crime; each person’s actual role and knowledge is decisive, not transaction counts.

PROBLEM 3

Assets restrained — what can be done

RESPONSE 3

The anti-money-laundering law provides processes to object to restraint and seek release under conditions — properly pursued, without guaranteed outcomes.

Who this concerns

Accused account holders, business operators receiving many transfers, and persons whose assets are under review.

Common objection

Does receiving a transfer later alleged to be fraud make me a launderer? — Not automatically. It must be proven you knew the funds derived from an offense and still received or moved them; a good-faith recipient who can explain the origin has arguments.

Evidence to preserve

  • Business documents and contracts explaining the receipts
  • Complete account records with the source of each item
  • History of the relationship with transferors
  • Data on spending or onward transfers

Relevant law

Anti-Money Laundering Act (knowledge and conduct concerning property)

Alleged involvement in human trafficking because of a labor supply or care businessView analysis ↓

Illustrative situation: For example, your labor supply or worker-care business is under review, with claims that parts of the process constitute trafficking because some hired persons are in vulnerable circumstances.

PROBLEM 1

Under review — what to examine first

RESPONSE 1

Examine employment contracts, recruitment methods, payment practices, and actual working conditions, for involuntary labor or exploitation of vulnerability — key elements of the offense.

PROBLEM 2

Several employees or brokers are implicated — how does my role differ

RESPONSE 2

Liability is individual, based on each person’s acts and knowledge; merely being an employer or manager is not automatically criminal.

PROBLEM 3

Vulnerable victims or witnesses are involved — what now

RESPONSE 3

Never contact or pressure victims or witnesses; act only through legal channels, as self-help can itself become a separate offense.

Who this concerns

Accused business operators, managers, and persons in labor supply or care operations.

Common objection

Does being an employer automatically mean participation in trafficking? — No. The law looks at each person’s acts and knowledge — whether forced labor, recruitment fraud, or exploitation of vulnerability actually occurred — verified from documents and conduct.

Evidence to preserve

  • Employment contracts and all recruitment documents
  • Pay records and working conditions
  • Communications with workers and brokers
  • Auditable process records

Relevant law

Penal Code s. 282 and related anti-trafficking statutes

Alleged sexual offense, or serious bodily harm, while the accounts conflictView analysis ↓

Illustrative situation: For example, a sexual allegation rests on one party’s account alone, or a fight left someone seriously injured with no clarity on who started and with what intent.

PROBLEM 1

Facing a sexual allegation — where to start

RESPONSE 1

Examine the full timeline, messages before and after, forensic evidence if any, and the true relationship — a single account is not always decisive, but challenges must be evidence-based.

PROBLEM 2

No eyewitnesses — can the case proceed?

RESPONSE 2

Yes. Courts consider circumstantial evidence — medical findings, messages, post-event conduct, and the credibility of both accounts — so a consistent statement matters greatly.

PROBLEM 3

Serious harm with conflicting versions — approach

RESPONSE 3

Separate who initiated, whether force was disproportionate, and how injuries map to conduct, using neutral evidence such as CCTV, medical records, and neutral witnesses.

Who this concerns

Suspects and defendants in sexual offense and serious bodily harm cases, and their families.

Common objection

Does a severe injury automatically mean I am at fault? — No. Severity shows the result, not who started or the intent; the sequence and all evidence must be examined, and no charge reduction is guaranteed.

Evidence to preserve

  • Timeline and relationship before and after the event
  • Conversations around the date of the incident
  • Relevant medical or forensic evidence
  • Neutral witnesses or nearby CCTV

Relevant law

Penal Code chapters on sexual offenses and bodily harm (per the specific charge) · s. 68 self-defense where conditions apply

OUR APPROACH

Evidence-First Criminal Litigation Assessment

Facts → Evidence → Legal Elements → Procedural Options

01

Facts — map the chronology and persons involved

02

Evidence — what exists, what is missing, what is verifiable

03

Legal elements — match each allegation to the law

04

Procedural options — complain, appeal, prosecute privately, or defend

Frequently Asked Questions

Is a lawyer mandatory to prosecute privately or defend?

The law does not require counsel in every case; many stages can be handled personally. But a private prosecution must satisfy CPC s. 158 content requirements and survive s. 162 preliminary examination, and defense missteps are hard to undo — counsel reduces risk in many cases.

Is filing directly with the court always faster than waiting for police and prosecutors?

Not always. Private prosecution presupposes a prior report and a non-prosecution order, and the court may order a preliminary examination first. Actual timing depends on evidence readiness and the case.

Does every criminal case have a 3-month complaint deadline?

No. The 3-month rule under Penal Code s. 96 applies to private offenses requiring a complaint; other offenses follow their own rules, and prosecution limitation under s. 95 varies by offense — each charge must be checked.

Does winning the criminal case automatically bring compensation?

Not automatically. A criminal judgment can support a civil damages claim in many cases, but civil procedures apply, and actual recovery depends on the counterparty’s assets.

Our Lawyers

นายสามารถ เพ็งแจ่ม
นายสามารถ เพ็งแจ่มLawyer · Thai lawyer licence number 370/2563

Provides legal services and handles engagements within the framework of the legal profession, giving consideration to the issues and facts of each matter

View lawyer profile ↗

Related Specialist Teams

Online Defamation & Reputation Disputes · Corruption & Official Misconduct Defense in Thailand · Criminal Complaint Assistance · Civil Litigation

Verified legal references: Criminal Procedure Code ss. 28, 123(1), 162 and 165 / Penal Code ss. 95 and 96 — application to an actual case requires case-by-case review, and this content is pending review by the responsible lawyer.
LET’S TALK

When a legal decision must be made

Contact the office to share the details of your matter and arrange a discussion on the way forward

Contact Channels ↗
☎ Call Office✆ WhatsApp